Idea Statica
  • Steel
  • Concrete
  • BIM & workflows
  • Support & Learning
  • Pricing
  • Company
  • Steel overview
  • Connection design
  • Member design
  • Parametric design
  • Steel case studies
  • Concrete overview
  • Walls and D-regions
  • Anchoring design
  • Members & cross-sections
  • Concrete case studies
  • BIM overview
  • Supported integrations
  • Checkbot
  • Viewer
  • APIs
  • Support Center
  • E-learning & certification
  • Blog
  • Downloads & Licensing
  • Plans
  • Free community tool
  • Enterprise customers
  • Students & educators
  • How much will you save?
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Research & development
  • Authorized resellers
  • Meet our customers
  • Career
  • Steel
    Steel overviewConnection designMember designParametric designSteel case studies
  • Concrete
    Concrete overviewWalls and D-regionsAnchoring designMembers & cross-sectionsConcrete case studies
  • BIM & workflows
    BIM overviewSupported integrationsCheckbotViewerAPIs
  • Support & Learning
    Support CenterE-learning & certificationBlogDownloads & Licensing
  • Pricing
    PlansFree community toolEnterprise customersStudents & educatorsHow much will you save?
  • Company
    About usContactResearch & developmentAuthorized resellersMeet our customersCareer
14-Day Trial
14-Day Trial
  • Steel
  • Concrete
  • BIM & workflows
  • Support & Learning
  • Pricing
  • Company

Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

  • About us
  • Partners
  • Careers
  • Patent

Resources

  • Customer projects
  • Case studies
  • Connection Library
  • Verification books

Legal

  • EULA
  • Global privacy policy
  • California Privacy
  • TOS Viewer
  • Licensing

Help

  • Contact
  • Quote request
  • Resellers
  • Downloads
FacebookInstagramLinkedInYouTube

© IDEA StatiCa 2009-2026

Trusted and used worldwide by engineers, fabricators & consultants.

Support CenterKnowledge Base ArticlesConnection analysis 0% or doesn't reach 100%
Advanced analysis types for your steel structures
Nonconformity in connection analysis results
Connection analysis 0% or doesn't reach 100%
What is the singularity warning?
Stop at limit strain
Torsion moments and warping
Warping of members – Load in shear center
Thin-walled (cold-formed) members
Load effects displayed in the scene
2nd generation of Eurocode 3 in Steel apps
Connection analysis 0% or doesn't reach 100%
Connection designSteelKnowledge baseConnectionEN (Eurocode)

Connection analysis 0% or doesn't reach 100%

This article is also available in
ENCZDEESFRITPTNLHUROKRPLTHTRVIZH

When an IDEA StatiCa connection analysis fails to reach 100% or stops at 0%, it is typically a warning message of numerical instability, material input errors, or geometric mesh distortion. The analysis engine detects these conditions and ensures users can see the potential sources of these incomplete or unstable results. This article breaks down the reasons behind the most common calculation failures.

  • Stop at limit strain
  • Too complex joint
  • Unstable analysis model of friction-based clamps
  • Material properties are set to 0
  • Analysis failure due to unconstrained direction in slotted holes
  • Lost of stability of hallow section during geometrically nonlinear analysis (GMNA)
  • Misalignment of finite elements of circular hollow sections
  • Too thin finite elements in the arc segments of hollow member

Analysis may also stop because of a singularity - read more about singularities in What is the singularity warning.

Stop at limit strain

In the Project settings, there is an option to activate the Stop at limit strain feature. If this is turned on, the analysis halts when the capacity of any part of the connection (e.g., a plate, a weld, etc.) is reached. In case the connection is overloaded, the analysis stops before the inputted load effects are fully applied and the actual percentage of used loads is displayed.

To see the whole picture, go to the Code setup and uncheck the Stop at limit strain - the software will now run 100% of the loads.

Too complex joint

When the joint model is very complex, the default capacity of the finite element analysis might not be sufficient, resulting in the analysis 0%. In such a case, the calculation capacity can be adjusted to enable the analysis to be completed.

In the Project settings, raise the values of the Number of analysis iterations from default value 25 to higher (e.g., 50) and the Divergent iterations count from default value 3 to higher (e.g., 5). This adds to the calculation capacity but also results in the calculation taking longer.

Unstable analysis model of friction clamps

The CBFEM model in IDEA StatiCa can not directly calculate and code-check friction between plates when modeling a connection based on friction and preloaded bolts, such as a clamp connection.

In such a connection, where only tension/compression force is applied and transferred via contact (compression-only), there is a small prying shear force generated. Since friction is not taken into account and, thus, the shear force is not transferred, the model is unstable.

In this case, it is necessary to add a "utility" weld in order to deal with the small shear force. For this, a Partial weld with Offset can be used. The analysis can then be finished, while the impact of the utility weld on the model behavior is negligible.

Material properties are set to 0

If a material property is filled with 0 (zero) or some non-acceptable value and this material is used in the project, the finite element model can not be calculated, and the analysis stops at 0%. This can be a property of a cross-section, steel material, bolt grade, etc.

Material parameters can be edited in the Materials tab, or possibly imported with a 0 value via a BIM link or CSV file (MPRL database).

Analysis failure due to unconstrained direction in slotted holes

In IDEA StatiCa Connection, bolts in slotted holes exclude resistance along the slot axis, allowing free movement in that direction. If a load or reaction component acts along the slot without a clear restraint, the analysis fails to converge.

To resolve this, model the connection as friction connection with preloaded bolts by setting Shear force transfer to Friction (based on design codes, this is only possible for high-strength bolts suitable for preloading).

Alternatively, since the physical joint permits only a limited range of movement, you can model the bolts using standard circular holes if the slotted release behavior is not intentionally required for your design model. In this case keep in mind that slotted holes reduce shear connection capacity under most design codes (e.g., Eurocode, AISC). Because standard holes will not automatically trigger these code-specific reductions in the software, you must manually check and verify the reduced shear capacity separately.

Lost of stability of hollow section during geometrically nonlinear analysis (GMNA)

GMNA means advanced geometrically nonlinear analysis, which provides more precise results for models mainly with hollow section members. By default, the GMNA solver is used only when the bearing member is a hollow section. GMNA analysis can be turned on/off in the Project settings.

When the connection is overloaded, the hollow sections might lose stability, which results in a break in the analysis at the current percentage of applied loads.

By disabling the GMNA in the Project settings, the analysis finishes with 100%, revealing the failure of the hollow section and other parts of the connection.

Misalignment of finite elements of circular hollow sections

In Connection, CHS members are modeled using plane shell elements which sometimes do not coincide with other mesh lines. This specifically happens when a perpendicular element is connected, or when the Cut operation (using the Mitre cut method) is used to cut and weld members with circular hollow sections.

For the cut of hollow sections, changing the  α - Rotation value of the one of the connected members helps align the elements so the butt weld can be created. The butt weld is represented by a yellow line, which is visible when the 3D view is switched to transparent mode.

A workaround for the connected perpendicular element is to change the cross-section to a Regular Polygon hollow section from the cold-formed database with a high number of vertices. Too thin elements in the arc segments can coused problem now, but that can be easily solved aditing the  Project settings as discrabed in the next paragraph.

Too thin finite elements in the arc segments of polygonal hollow member

When modelling a members with circular hollow sections defined as polygons, in some cases the calculation may result in the analysis 0% due to the aspect ratio of the finite shell elements in the arc segments of the polygonal hollow member.

In such cases, in Project settings – Calculation – Model, decrease the value of Division of arc of rectangular hollow member from the default value of 3 to a lower value (e.g. 1). This modification changes the aspect ratio of the finite shell elements in the arc segments of polygonal hollow member.

To prevent the generation of shell finite elements in the arc segments of a polygonal hollow member, the user can alternatively decrease the inner radius of a fold to a value of 1 mm when defining the circular hollow section as a polygon (select the relevant member in the Members tree, in the Properties window edit the Cross-section, and set the Inner radius of a fold to 1 mm).

The deformation exceeds 1 m

There is a warning message displayed in the overall results when large displacements are detected, even if all code-checks formally pass. These deformations usually occur on the invisible part of loaded members, called the Condensed superelements.

In such a case, it is important to review the deformed model and consider the correctness of the connection model behavior. Go to the Check tab, turn on the Plastic strain display, Mesh, and Deformed shape, and use the scale to inspect the model in the 3D scene.

Then, possibly modify model settings, check the loads in equilibrium, or change the design.

Read more about problems with analysis in the blogs Why did my validation fail? and Troubleshooting IDEA StatiCa Connection models.

Related articles

Bolts are too close to plate edge
  • Steel
  • Connection
  • Bolts
  • Manufacturing operations
  • Plates
  • +5
  • Steel
  • Connection
  • Bolts
  • Manufacturing operations
  • Plates

Knowledge base

Bolts are too close to plate edge

Read more
Checkbot (BIM link) does not start
  • Steel
  • Checkbot
  • BIM link
  • Advance Steel
  • Tekla Structures
  • Revit
  • SAP2000
  • Robot Structural Analysis
  • AxisVM
  • ETABS
  • RFEM
  • RSTAB
  • SCIA Engineer
  • Advance Design
  • STAAD.Pro
  • midas Civil + Gen
  • SDS2
  • RAM Structural System
  • +18
  • Steel
  • Checkbot
  • BIM link
  • Advance Steel
  • Tekla Structures
  • Revit
  • SAP2000
  • Robot Structural Analysis
  • AxisVM
  • ETABS
  • RFEM
  • RSTAB
  • SCIA Engineer
  • Advance Design
  • STAAD.Pro
  • midas Civil + Gen
  • SDS2
  • RAM Structural System

Knowledge base

Checkbot (BIM link) does not start

Read more
What is the singularity warning?
  • Steel
  • Connection
  • Modeling
  • +3
  • Steel
  • Connection
  • Modeling

Knowledge base

What is the singularity warning?

Read more
Analysis stops or doesn't start - DiCAD
  • Steel
  • Concrete
  • Connection
  • Detail 2D
  • Detail 3D
  • Beam
  • RCS
  • Member
  • +8
  • Steel
  • Concrete
  • Connection
  • Detail 2D
  • Detail 3D
  • Beam
  • RCS
  • Member

Knowledge base

Analysis stops or doesn't start - DiCAD

Read more